Words of Appreciation for Professor Gene Emanuel

It came as a great shock to the community to learn of Professor Gene Emanuel’s passing on Thursday.  Although I did send out a tweet and posted a message on the VIHistory.com Facebook page, I wanted to take a moment here in my blog to pay respects to Professor Gene Emanuel.  It was Professor Emanuel who provided the inspiration for me to build this site and keep it going for as long as I have.  I think anyone who has ever had the pleasure of taking his VI History course has some interesting stories to tell about the experience.  His methods were quirky but effective.  Whoever takes up his reign has some pretty big shoes (or rather sandals) to fill.  R.I.P. Professor Emanuel.  You will be missed.

Senator Malone Offers Real Solutions

I have been critical of Senator Shawn-Michael Malone in the past, but I have to give credit where credit is due.  Earlier last week he submitted a Press Release detailing possible cost saving measures the territory could undertake to address our fiscal crisis.  Below is the full text of the release”

Office of Senator Shawn-Michael Malone
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Press Release

For Immediate Release
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Contact: 693-3582/ 693-3529

For Immediate Release 6/21/11

Malone presents plans for fiscal recovery(REVISED)

Senator says most austerity measures must be implemented by Executive Branch

CHARLOTTE AMALIE, Virgin Islands - Senator Shawn-Michael Malone said the Virgin
Islands Government can only recover financially through a combination of austerity
policies and temporary measures to raise revenues.

“I have been working on a series of initiatives to both save money and increase
collections, however most of these efforts require the cooperation of and action
from the Chief Executive,” Malone said.

Malone pointed to his suggestion that the Government eliminate or reduce cell phone
use as a prime example. The Virgin Islands Government spends more than $1 million
each year on cell phone service.

“The State of California has eliminated about half of its Government issued phones
with great success,” Malone said. “Even Governor Jerry Brown and his cabinet have
given up their phones, however this came as a result of an Executive Order from
Governor Brown and in order for us to get rid of phones our Governor must do the
same thing.”

Malone recently announced that he would begin paying his own cell phone bill and
said that there is no reason that anyone other than emergency responders should
have a Government issued phone in these times of fiscal crisis.

“I am calling on our Governor to issue an Executive Order in this regard,” Malone
said. “We are in a similar situation when it comes to my measure to reduce the number
of Government cars on the road, eliminate the distribution of gas coupons for all
but emergency vehicles and institute cutbacks on travel.”

Malone, who has always driven his own vehicle, said that all such perks must be
entirely eliminated before large scale dismissals of Government workers is considered.
He pointed to the neighboring British Virgin Islands’ success in eliminating most
of its Government vehicles.

“It is irresponsible to discuss wide scale layoffs given the negative ripple effect
it will have in a community of this size,” Malone said. “It would be social and
economic chaos.”

Malone said his proposals to reduce spending on phones, cars, travel and gasoline
would bring about immediate savings, but would require some level of sacrifice and
change. The Senator said many of his other initiatives also require direct action
on behalf of the Governor.

“We must renegotiate with our private landlords and we must be more aggressive in
our efforts to collect the debts we are owed,” Malone said. “There is a separation
of powers under the law that prevents the Legislature from getting directly involved
in these matters — the Governor must take the lead.”

The Senator said that wherever possible he had drafted legislation to support his
plans for fiscal recovery and that he would consider all viable proposals brought
forward in this week’s session.

Malone’s plans include:

1) Elimination of all Government issued cell phones.

2) Elimination of Government vehicles, with excess cars immediately sold at auction.
Earlier this year, Malone requested an automobile inventory from the Department
of Property & Procurement.

3) 30 percent reduction in the travel budgets of all agencies.

4) Renegotiate with Economic Development Authority beneficiaries to pay taxes now
and defer their tax breaks for a period of time. In response to the looming fiscal
problems, earlier this year Malone asked the EDA to consider taking this step and
said there is a precedent for it.

5) Calling for the Executive Branch to take steps to aggressively collect corporate
franchise and other delinquent taxes.

6) Renegotiate leases for Government tenants renting from private landlords.

7) Implementation of a temporary 10 percent income tax surcharge.

8) Assess Government properties to determine whether new revenues can be raised
through leases or sales.

9) Implement a Voluntary Four Day Work Week - workers willing to take a pay cut
would be granted a day off to spend as they choose.

10) Elimination of gas coupons for all but emergency vehicles.

11) Establish a credit offsetting program.

12) Institute a pre-paid Government benefits program, saving money on printing
and processing checks.

13) Raise Duty Free Exemptions from $1,500 to $10,000 in order to stimulate
more spending by visitors.

14) Downsizing the Casino Control Commission to three members.

15) Implement a freeze on all professional service contracts/reduce
encumbrances.

16) Reducing salaries by 10 percent of those Government workers making
more than $75,000 annually.

When it comes to my measure to reduce the number of Government cars on the road,
eliminate the distribution of gas coupons for all but emergency vehicles and institute
cutbacks on travel.”

Malone, who has always driven his own vehicle, said that all such perks must be
entirely eliminated before large scale dismissals of Government workers is considered.
He pointed to the neighboring British Virgin Islands’ success in eliminating most
of its Government vehicles.

“It is irresponsible to discuss wide scale layoffs given the negative ripple effect
it will have in a community of this size,” Malone said. “It would be social and
economic chaos.”

Malone said his proposals to reduce spending on phones, cars, travel and gasoline
would bring about immediate savings, but would require some level of sacrifice and
change. The Senator said many of his other initiatives also require direct action
on behalf of the Governor.

I applaud Senator Malone for at least reaching out into the community with ideas and looking for feedback from the public.  I, like many of my constituents during this process, have felt like bystanders even though we were talking about possible solutions ourselves.

That doesn’t mean I won’t take this opportunity to digest some of the items though. :)

  1. There are some agencies that required a degree of constant remote communication.  If those agencies are federally funded they should be allowed to keep their cell phones.  If not, a stipend to allow employees to purchase and use a cell for work purposes would be preferable. (On that note, I find it disturbing that federal funds were not thought through.  How are we addressing the local match for federal funds?)
  2. Calling back vehicles is also something that needs to be addressed meticulously.  Agencies should have the leverage to justify their vehicle usage.  Naturally first response vehicles are off limits but we should also consider vehicles that are used to provide valuable services to the public and other agencies.
  3. I think the travel budget should be reduced even more.  There are many free to low cost telecommunication options we can employ.  If the law doesn’t allow for it, they should be adjusted.
  4. I like #4.  It’s fine as is.
  5. Fine
  6. Fine
  7. Whoa, I think with an 8% salary reduction we’ve balanced enough of this on the backs of the working class.
  8. It’s ok, but leases can be tricky.
  9. I’m assuming this would be in place of the 8% cut.  If implement with other cost saving measures it has merit.  On its own, it’s not enough.
  10. Eliminating coupons is a bit much.  I’d be more in favor of rationing.
  11. Fine
  12. Fine
  13. It could work, but I get the feeling that the duty free exemption is a game we play on the federal court.
  14. I agree 100%.  Why do we have so many Casino Control Commission members for just one casino?  Granted the Nevada Gaming Commission and State Control Board is an entire agency, they’ve only got 5 members for the entire state.
  15. This item would have to depend on a needs analysis.
  16. More than fine.

Our Fiscal Crisis: Let’s Try Some Solutions

There are some truly dark days on the horizon when layoffs of public employees is on the table.  Fortunately Senate leaders have promised to cut the deficit before layoffs become necessary.  I believe now is the time that the they truly need input from the community.  We must not forget that they were elected to speak on our behalves.  I have heard a lot of good ideas coming from the community and I hope that our leaders will take much of them seriously.  I just wanted to take a moment to relate some of the more positive suggestions I’ve heard and add a few of my own:

  1. Establish a personnel merit system and establish pay grades.
  2. Increase port fees (This has actually been done already.  I had to point out to someone that our port fees was one of the lowest in the Caribbean and had not changed in close to 20 years).
  3. Government agencies should cut back their spending.
    This one is already in the works but I want to take this one a step further.  I say we bring in an efficiency expert.
  4. Disallow the use of government vehicles after work hours (this would of course be relaxed for emergency staff and sections of government that need to perform duties outside the regular 8am-5pm shift).
  5. Disallow inter-island travel simply for the sake of meetings (This most likely won’t apply to many boards since many of the laws that create them require physical meetings).  On the surface this may seem rash but with all the advances in technology it’s possible for several people to meet via teleconferencing right from their office desks.  Take for example ooVoo, a free videoconferencing solution that allows up to 6 people to meet for free.  If needed, a more robust system can be purchased.  Several offices already have videoconferencing ability; they just need to use them.
  6. All government offices should be networked so that they can share resources like printers and scanners.
    Yep, that’s my suggestion.  Generally people aren’t aware of the hidden costs of printers.  Here’s a brief white paper that goes into more detail.  If you really want to go in-depth, take a look at this paper.
  7. Allow for telecommuting.
    Also my suggestion.  I can already read your mind on this: How does letting someone work from home save the government money?  Take a look at this.  Not to mention the energy savings to the offices themselves.  I’m willing to bet if each office allowed one employee to work from home once a week they’d notice significant savings in their bottom line.

How’s that?  I’d love to hear more ideas (especially positive ones).  Feel free to comment with yours.

Students Protest at Educational Complex

A brief rundown on this.  The students at the Educational Complex got wind a rumor that their principal Kurt Vialet was going to be transferred to another school.  The students took it upon themselves to stage a protest.  The protest was strongly condemned by the Department of Education, but there was no mention of Kurt Vialet’s fate.  So the next day, they did it again.

The opinions of what going on are sharply divided.  Some praise their actions and others condemn them.  One thing is clear though: these students managed to learn one very important lesson.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Sound familiar?  If you’ve ever taken a history class it should.  That’s the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America.  This one great freedom keeps everyone in check.  Honestly, how will our leaders know what we’re for and what we aren’t for if we don’t say anything?

Our community has what I think is a rather jaded view of our youth (and strangely enough it carries on into adulthood).  They tend to believe children don’t have the capacity to understand what older folks have to deal with.  But instead of taking the opportunity to teach, there’s usually outcry, blame, and a resounding “sit down, shut up and just do as I say”.

The students at Educational Complex had their moment in the sun, but by day 2 we missed an opportunity to teach them something.  I’m confident that if Kurt Vialet is as caring and understanding as his students say he is he will bring them all in for a heart to heart and let them know that if he is transferred he’ll be going off to give other students the same opportunities he’s provided to them and that although they do have the right to assemble and make their voices heard they shouldn’t sacrifice their education to do so.

At the same time, the Department of Education shouldn’t ignore the bond Kurt Vialet has with the students.  It’s rare for students to act in such an uproarious manner.  If the plan truly is to remove him then I hope they’ll be adding another school counselor to the staff.

Why We Need To Support The VI Next Generation Network

Relating Information Technology to those who aren’t savvy is a difficult task.  Over four years working in an IT role has taught me that.  It takes years of training and experience for IT professionals to get where they are today.  Unfortunately, Information Technology is one of the most distrusted professions out there.  If a medical professional tells you one of your kidneys has failed and you need a new one, you wouldn’t hesitate to agree.  If a IT professional tells you your hard drive has crashed and unless you’re willing to send it to a recovery lab all your data is gone, questions are asked and there’s always always a second, third or even fourth opinion involved.

Naturally, Senators had questions regarding the need to authorize the issuance of up to $42 million in gross receipts tax bonds to help finance the broadband project.  Unfortunately those questions were focused more on VINGN President Julito Francis’ salary than how VINGN will benefit the Virgin Islands.  Fortunately, there is a chance to save this badly needed initiative at a bumped up hearing date on Tuesday, April 5, 2011.

We have been afforded an amazing opportunity in being able to secure all 4 Broadband grants.  We’re the only ones in the the entire United States of America that has been able to do so.  I think part of the reason is that in terms of technology and telecommunications we’re well behind most of the country and especially in the Caribbean.  Did you know that Anguilla, Antigua & Barbuda, Aruba, The Bahamas, Barbados, Bermuda, Dominica, The Dominican Republic, Jamaica, Puerto Rico, St. Kitts & Nevis, St. Lucia, and Trinidad & Tobago all surpass the US Virgin Islands in percent of Internet penetration?

Dr. Peter Schultz, in a recent Op-Ed, succinctly states the purpose of these four broadband grants:

What are we going to build? First, we are building what is called an “open access middle mile broadband network.” That is a mouthful. What it means is that we are installing main loops of fiber optic cables on St. Croix, St. John, St. Thomas and Water Island. We are connecting these islands together through undersea fiber optic cable and connecting this network to the rest of the world through several existing long haul undersea fiber optic cables. This network will have extremely high bandwidth (information carrying capacity) and will be capable of serving all of the Territories’ communications needs for many, many years to come. It is also “open access,” which means viNGN is not going into the business of providing services to the end user (you), but rather, we will sell this bandwidth to the service providers who already serve you today, such as Choice, Innovative and Broadband VI who could not afford to build such an expensive network themselves. We are not going into the business of competing with them.

Here’s the concept in a nutshell:  For current providers to deliver high speed Internet requires running connections from their source, running fiber to your front door and then installing the equipment that allows you to use it.  It’s an expensive proposition and that’s why local ISPs charge so much for this service.  The Next Generation Network takes that out of the equation, allowing local ISPs to “piggyback” on it.  As a result it costs them less to deliver high speed Internet and the savings should pass on to the consumer.  But there’s more:

Our network will also connect all of our schools, the university, libraries, medical facilities, government offices, police, fire, emergency services (such as 911 and disaster communications) and WAPA into this ultra high speed communication network. It will bring our communication system into the 21st century.

And, under these grants, we will receive funding to build and connect to this network 51 public computer centers with a total of 745 computer work stations which are available to the general public to have high speed Internet services that many people cannot afford at home. These will be located in public libraries, community centers, senior citizens centers and the Boys and Girls Clubs and can give our children, senior citizens and all residents direct access to a high speed computer Internet connection free of charge. These grants also provide us with funds to teach our citizens how to use and benefit from these services through a “Sustainable Broadband Adoption Project.”

Yes, you read that right. This will represent a major upgrade to the existing Government Wide Area Network AND will provide access terminals that the public can access FOR FREE.

What does it cost us?  And by “us” I mean the taxpayers.  Julito Francis addressed that in this article:

Francis said he found concern over the bonding “ironic,” because over the long run, the new government-owned company will generate revenue, and over the short and medium run, will not affect the V.I. budget.

“All of the figures clearly show none of this will affect the general fund, and all of the debt service will be paid for by viNGN,” he said. On top of that, the government will save millions of dollars per year in internet service by owning its own backbone.

“A case in point: The University of the Virgin Islands spends $218,000 per year for microwave broadband between campuses. That goes away.” The government of the Virgin Islands pays three to four million dollars per year for internet access too, and adding the new system to the territory’s infrastructure should create competition and lower the cost, while increasing bandwidth, he said. “We should save up to 80 percent,” Francis said.

But as I stated before, there seems to be a natural distrust of new technology.  People fear what they don’t understand.  I’ve seen a number of boisterous claims as to why this requires greater scrutiny or should not be done at all.  I want to take on some of those claims.  And a quick disclaimer, these responses are based on my own observations and experience.  I’m not the ultimate authority but I believe I can offer some insight.

Why is the legislature not seeking the advise of technical experts in this area?

Good question.  Call your Senators today (well, not today, it’s Sunday…but definitely Monday) and ask them.  Expect to hear from your local IT pros (such as yours truly) because from what I’ve seen and heard we all are behind this project.

Why is the President of VINGN being paid nearly double the salary of the Commissioners of Education, Police, and Human Services?

Because he’s doing the work of two people: A Chief Executive Officer and a Chief Technology Officer.  These are roles necessary for completing something of this magnitude and splitting the roles into two separate positions would definitely be more costly.  Currently the average salary for a CEO/CTO in the US is $181,000.

Who will be contracted to run the fiber?

That remains to be seen.  So far all VINGN has contracted is consulting, development and planning services.  Local business who’d like to get in on the action should visit their website and make their presence known.

Would it not be far better to allow a private corporation with the technological resources to build and maintain this broadband infrastructure ?

It’s actually not very uncommon for city or state governments to implement their own Internet backbone.  The very first Internet was on a government backbone.  Here’s a story on one city that received a broadband grant.  But I digress.  These grants were available to whomever could make the most compelling case and ensure they can get the job done in their region.  If anyone was competing with VINGN for the grants then they apparently lost.  Crying about it now is like saying you should have won the scholarship even when the other guy got better grades than you.  Should that stop a private corporation from doing the same work?  Heck no.  They just have to do it on their own dime.  By the way, obtaining the technological resources to build and maintain the broadband infrastructure is covered in the grant.

Can we choose wireless towers instead of running more wires on WAPA poles again?

No and yes.  No in that wireless signals are radio waves while fiber optics transmits beams of light.  Simple physics: light is faster than radio.  If we want a high speed network, fiber is the way to go.  Yes in that you don’t run fiber optics above ground on poles.  They’re way too delicate for that.  Fiber has to be buried.  WAPA’s involvement in the project is being able to supply power to all the conduit locations.

In conclusion, this has been a long time coming.  We have a chance to take a quantum leap forward, surpass our neighbors in networking and telecommunication and create a competitive technology product that will spur competition and new business.  We simply cannot afford to miss this opportunity.  If we do we’ll be relying on the hope that some private industry will be willing to make the same investment.  The chances of that happening is very unlikely.  Now must be the time we make this happen.

8 Ways You Can Help Japan

The globe was rocked by the news March 11, as an 8.9 earthquake in Japan caused widespread destruction and set off a 23-foot Pacific tsunami. This has been called the fifth largest earthquake in recorded history.

More than 50 aftershocks were recorded, along with a second earthquake that measured 6.7. Hundreds were killed or injured, with many thousands reported missing.

Follow this link to read more

Disarray Indeed

A recent Op-Ed in the VI Daily News caught my eye.  Mostly because it hit on an issue that has been on my mind throughout the 2010 election: The unity of the Party and our inability to work as a unit.  The op-ed by Woodrow Greene keys in on several conclusions he drew as a result of the current election:

  • The Democratic Party has no principles or purpose.
  • The party provides no support to its candidates.
  • The party is nonfunctional.
  • The Democratic Party needs to be reorganized in all areas.

Here’s my take on all of that using Politifact’s famous rating system:

  • The Democratic Party has no principles or purpose. HALF TRUE
    The Democratic Party of the Virgin Islands does have written bylaws and follow certain procedures.  Where we fall short is the lack of a Party Platform.  Without our purpose and goals clearly written in a Party Platform, elected Democrats are free to do whatever they wish.  There are some who choose to acknowledge the Party and some that do not.  That will not change until…well, check the next bullet point for that.
  • The party provides no support to its candidates. MOSTLY TRUE
    The Democratic Party of the US Virgin Islands will verbally support all Democrats who make it to the General Election.  Occasionally this is even done in print.  Where we fall short here is in directly monetary contributions to Democratic aspirants.  The Democratic Party of the US Virgin Islands represents the largest voting block in the VI.  There is a problem though getting the general electorate to be more active in the process.  We have a lot of DINOs (Democrats In Name Only), but can you blame them?  We have no Platform that defines us.  It is only when the Party can provide significant funding to our aspirants will we achieve greater influence.
  • The party is nonfunctional. BARELY TRUE
    Nonfunctional means “doesn’t work”.  Trust me, the Party does do some work.  I rate this as barely true though because the Territorial Committee really needed to meet more and convene on many issues over the last two years.  Additionally, even though it would have had little impact, many members needed to be officially censured for breaking party lines.
  • The Democratic Party needs to be reorganized in all areas. TRUE
    This is absolutely true.  That area in my opinion is with the Democratic Clubs.  We need to have the Clubs united under the Party; not INDIVIDUALS.  Clubs were created in order to localize the Party and bring individuals from a community into a Democratic unit.  They’re supposed to be smaller units working towards the greater will of the entire Party.  For quite some time this hasn’t been the case.  The Clubs have more and more become vehicles for individual candidates instead of all Democratic candidates.  I honestly feel that once a Party Platform has been approved, the clubs should be broken down and then reformed from the ground up.

I’ve made no bones about it.  If the Democratic Party of the US Virgin Islands ever wants to organize properly, WE MUST HAVE A PARTY PLATFORM.  It is my frustration trying to spark movement on the platform is why I’ve been somewhat disenchanted with the local party and why I have not posted on “the chat room” in some time despite being a moderator.  I am eagerly awaiting the beginning of the new term to see if we’re ready to make the necessary changes to make the Party significant again.  I also encourage fellow Democrats to read the op-ed.  It’s critical but it speaks volumes.

Just Vote

Time for some non-partisan advice:  Just vote.  Voting is essentially your voice in this entire process.  As much as I’d prefer you go out there and vote Democrat, I really just want you to vote.  See you all at the polls tomorrow.

2010 Legislative Report Card Available Online

The report is published online at the Generation Now, Inc. website (at the time of this posting the site was unavailable but fortunately I was able to get a copy and post one in an alternate location).  It’s definitely worth a read before November 2nd.  Generation Now, Inc. does not appear partisan and the report is quantitative so it should give you an unbiased snapshot of what the 28th Legislature has accomplished.  I personally have not had an opportunity to do a fact check (and given the massive amount of info the report compiles I doubt I’ll have time to), but I invite to to compare the results to the records posted on the VI Legislature website.

Endorsements Gone Wild

The Mapp Campaign has made a big to-do about parading former governors in support of his campaign, but with the recent announcement of former Gov. Roy Lester Schneider endorsing Kenneth Mapp I feel I need to say something.  But before I do, I will say that Gov. John P. deJongh’s endorsement by President of the United States Barack Obama is natural.  The US Virgin Islands delivered him his biggest victory in the race for the Democratic nomination and deJongh was vocal in his support for President Obama.  Ok, I’ve evened up the table.

Wondering why Mapp has been able to garner these nominations?  I won’t comment as to any’s style of leadership but let’s begin:

Gov. Charles Wesley Turnbull

Gov. Turnbull appointed Kenneth Mapp to head the Public Finance Authority.  Fair enough, but in 2003 controversy arose as to payments rendered to Kenneth Mapp via ICC Corporation.  To this day, the nature and motives of those payments have yet to be disclosed.  I cannot be certain of the legality of those payments but I firmly believe a crime had been committed then guilty parties would have been prosecuted.  But the case casts an ominous black spot on Turnbull’s record which has been marred by a number of cases of corruption.  Naturally Gov. Turnbull would shore up a nomination for Mapp to save his reputation.

Gov. Roy Lester Schneider

This one is easy.  Admitting Mapp was a failure as his Lieutenant Governor is the same as admitting his own failure as Governor.  Despite numerous falling outs, it’s only natural for Schneider to endorse Mapp.

Now I’m not saying the two endorsements aren’t significant.  It should simply be noted that endorsements are rarely motivated selfless intentions.  My advice: look at all the endorsements and ask yourself who had the least to gain by offering theirs.

P.S.  I see that Kenneth Mapp has finally posted a platform.  It’s dated October 15th, 2010. Awful close to the General Election don’t you think?

****disclaimer****

Once again I feel the need to emphasize that this blog represents my personal opinion.  I have never or will ever purport to be an accredited news source as some other blogs have.  Links to accredited news sources have been added throughout this and many of my previous blog entries.  Your agreement with the content of said sources are completely at your discretion.

Search:

Subscribe:

He is Mike and together with other 100 people, he prefers to reed my feed (?). Subscribe!

Sponsored links:

I recommend:

  • Recommandation 1
  • Recommandation 2
  • Recommandation 2
  • Recommandation 2

Social networks:

  • Twitter
  • MySpace
  • Youtube
  • Hi5